![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/jolt.richmond.edu/jolt-archive/images/smalllogo.jpg)
Volume VI, Issue 2, Fall 1999
Related Browsing for:
The Fourth Circuit's Narrow Definition of "Matters of Public Concern" Denies State-Employed Academics Their Say: Urofsky v. Gilmore.
by Michael D. Hancock
Related Browsing provides the readers with other web pages that may be of interest.http://www.gmu.edu/facstaff/handbook/preamble.html. This website contains George Mason University's Preamble.
http://www.gamu.edu/facstaff/handbook/c2/s4.html. Criteria for the Evaluation of Faculty members at George Mason University.
http://www.gamu.edu/facstaff/handbook/c2/s4.html. George Mason University's Policies and Procedures Relating to Severance.
http://mason.gmu.edu/~psmith5/censor.html. The whole sordid story on Plaintiff Smith's website.
http://www.aclu.org/court/urofskyvallendec.html. The ACLU sets forth the district court opinion granting summary judgment to plaintiffs.
http://www.youth.org/loco/PERSONProject/Alerts/States/NorthCarolina/freedom.html. This is an article on Boring v. Buncombe County, which is one of the cases cited in the note.
http://www.loundy.com/CASES/Urofsky_v_Allen.html. This website contains the text of the case, Urofsky v. Allen.
http://www.nea.org/cet/BRIEFS/brief12.html. "Focus on Technology."
http://www.freedomforum.org/speech/1998/2/16drama.asp. A North Carolina court says that an educator's First Amendment rights not are violated.
ncG1vJloZqOnnKl7s7XCoaSoppRjsqXBjqOmpaxdlr%2BktMivnGiuZp5%2FcLrOrZxsl6KauaLAxJ1loaydoQ%3D%3D